Loading...

Management Consulting Case Study: Winter Olympics Bidding

By Nandini Khemariya · Published · Updated

Share post:
Management Consulting Case Study: Winter Olympics Bidding

How much is a fortnight of television worth? This management consulting case study asks a US network to put a number on the Winter Olympics, and rewards candidates who can separate the hard cash from the harder-to-measure benefits.

Case Scenario

Our client is a significant US television network that has asked us to help determine the appropriate bid for the 2018 Winter Olympics. The Winter Olympics are big business, and acquiring the rights will cost a lot of money. The network wants to be certain that all the appropriate factors have been taken into account before it submits a bid.

Quantitative Approach

The candidate should identify three costs: production costs, opportunity costs, and the time value of money. By factoring in these costs, they will find out whether the investment is worth it.

Qualitative Approach

The rights might give the network access to new viewers. There is prestige associated with broadcasting the event. The air time can be used to promote other programming, and there are opportunities for product tie-ins and supplemental revenue.

Question 1: Broadcasting Revenue

Determine the Winter Olympics' broadcasting earnings.

Weekdays (Monday to Friday): 10 weekdays × 4 hours/day × 10 min/hr × 2 slots/min × $400K/ad = $320M. Weekends: 4 days × 10 hrs/day at $400,000/ad = $240M.

Revenue note: advertisers spend $428,000,000 on advertising for prime time (Monday to Friday 7-11 PM and all weekend) and $200K/ad for non-prime time.

Question 2: Is It a Wise Investment?

Taking costs into account, find the NPV.

With a six-year lag and a 12% WACC, all future cash flows must be roughly halved. $928M − $428M of total costs − $146M of opportunity cost (2 days × 3 hours × $1M/hr) = $346M in present value.

Recommended Solution

The project has a $177M NPV, but because there are additional intangible benefits (new viewers, promotion of our programmes, and prestige), the bid should not stop at $177M. Although there is no single right answer, most replies should fall between $200M and $300M. If there is a considerable departure from the $200M mark, the candidate will need to give detailed reasoning and make a convincing case.

Want to upskill yourself? If yes, then join our free workshops: jobaajlearnings.com/workshop

Practise More Consulting Case Studies

Jobaaj Learnings management consulting program

Want to put this into practice? Try our prep cases and practice drills, or compare membership plans.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Winter Olympics bidding case testing?

Valuation under uncertainty. You build up advertising revenue from a few assumptions, subtract production and opportunity costs, discount for the time value of money, and then decide how much the intangible benefits are worth on top.

How is the advertising revenue estimated?

By multiplying broadcast hours by ad slots per hour and the price per slot, separately for weekdays and weekends. Prime-time slots (weekday evenings and all weekend) command around $400K each, non-prime slots around $200K.

Why are the cash flows halved in the NPV calculation?

Because the Games are six years away and the network's cost of capital is 12%. Discounting six years at 12% cuts the value of future cash flows to roughly half.

What is a sensible bid?

Somewhere between $200M and $300M. The financial NPV alone is lower, but new viewers, cross-promotion of other programming and the prestige of hosting the broadcast justify bidding above it, as long as you can explain why.


N

Written by

Management Consultant

All articles by Nandini Khemariya

Relevant tags:

#CaseStudy #CaseInterview #ManagementConsulting #NPV #ValuationCase #MediaCase #ConsultingPrep

Share post:

Related articles