Loading...

Management Consulting Case Study: Toothbrush Wars

By Nandini Khemariya · Published · Updated

Share post:
Management Consulting Case Study: Toothbrush Wars

A cheap new product appears, grabs a slice of the market, and the client's first instinct is to copy it. This management consulting case study shows why the maths of profit per customer, not market share, should drive the answer.

Case Scenario

A unit of a major consumer goods manufacturer that makes toothbrushes is our client. One year ago, a brand-new rival launched a $5 battery-operated electric "spinbrush", which has since gained 1% of the global toothbrush market.

Key Problem

The client is interested in learning whether it should create a product equivalent to the one it does not currently offer. Typically, the client looks at the market in terms of margins and KPIs such as profit per customer per year.

Specific Information

Around the world, 20% of toothbrushes were rechargeable and 80% were manual one year ago. The 1% market share gained by the spinbrush primarily came at the expense of sales of rechargeable toothbrushes. According to the client's product development team, a spinbrush "knockoff" could be made for $3 per brush.

Analysis

The best strategy starts by figuring out how much money is made from each customer every year.

Manual: [2 toothbrushes bought] × [$3 retail] × [66% profit margin] = $4 profit per customer per year

Rechargeable: ([2 heads bought] × [$5 retail] × [90% profit margin]) + ([1/10 base] × [$50 retail] × [60% profit margin]) = $12 profit per customer per year

Spinbrush: assuming that the client's and its rival's manufacturing costs are equal, [2 toothbrushes bought] × ($5 price − $3 manufacturing cost) = $4 profit per customer per year

Although the profitability of the manual and spinbrush products is comparable, the manual toothbrush serves the mass market (80% market share at a $3 retail price point) and is therefore unlikely to be displaced by the spinbrush.

Recommendation

The spinbrush is obviously a danger to the rechargeable market, which is where the client is most profitable. The client's successful rechargeable business would probably end sooner if it responded with a "knockoff" spinbrush of its own. As a result, the client should think of alternative ways to react to the "disruptive technology" of the spinbrush.

Want to upskill yourself? If yes, then join our free workshops: jobaajlearnings.com/workshop

Practise More Consulting Case Studies

Jobaaj Learnings management consulting program

Want to put this into practice? Try our prep cases and practice drills, or compare membership plans.

Frequently asked questions

What is the toothbrush wars case about?

A consumer goods client is deciding whether to copy a rival's $5 electric spinbrush that has taken 1% of the global toothbrush market. The case tests whether you reach for profit per customer rather than market share.

How is profit per customer per year calculated here?

Manual brushes earn about $4 per customer a year, rechargeable brushes about $12 (two heads plus a share of the $50 base unit), and a spinbrush knockoff would also earn about $4 if the client's costs match the rival's.

Should the client launch a knockoff spinbrush?

No. The spinbrush mainly eats into rechargeable sales, which is the client's most profitable segment. Launching a copy would speed up the decline of that business rather than protect it.

What is the lesson for case interviews?

Match the response to where the money is. When a disruptive product threatens your highest-margin segment, copying it can be the worst option, and the interviewer wants to hear you consider alternatives.


N

Written by

Management Consultant

All articles by Nandini Khemariya

Relevant tags:

#CaseStudy #CaseInterview #ManagementConsulting #CompetitiveStrategy #ConsumerGoods #ConsultingPrep #MBB

Share post:

Related articles